Men's Decision-Making About Predictive BRCA1/2 Testing: The Role Of Family
N. Hallowell (1, 7)
A. Ardern-Jones (2)
R. Eeles (3)
C. Foster (4)
A. Lucassen (5)
C. Moynihan (3) and
M. Watson (6)
(1) Public Health Sciences, The Medical School, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
(2) Cancer Genetics Clinic, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
(3) Translational Cancer Genetics Team and Cancer Genetics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
(4) Macmillan Research Unit, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
(5) Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
(6) Department of Psychological Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
(7) Public Health Sciences, The Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, United Kingdom
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Issue: Volume 14, Number 3
Date: June 2005
Pages: 207 - 217
Men who have a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer may be offered a predictive genetic test to determine whether or not they carry the family specific BRCA1/2 mutation. Male carriers may be at increased risk of breast and prostate cancers. Relatively little is known about at-risk men's decision-making about BRCA1/2 testing. This qualitative study explores the influences on male patients' genetic test decisions. Twenty-nine in-depth interviews were undertaken with both carrier and non-carrier men and immediate family members (17 male patients, 8 female partners, and 4 adult children). These explored family members' experiences of cancer and genetic testing, decision-making about testing, family support, communication of test results within the family, risk perception and risk management. Implicit influences on men's testing decisions such as familial obligations are examined. The extent to which other family members-partners and adult children-were involved in testing decisions is also described. It is demonstrated that mothers of potential mutation carriers not only perceive themselves as having a right to be involved in making this decision, but also were perceived by their male partners as having a legitimate role to play in decision-making. There was evidence that (adult) children were excluded from the decision-making, and some expressed resentment about this. The implications of these findings for the practice of genetic counseling are discussed.
(C) Journal of Genetic Counseling
Posted by: Tressie Dalaya
Message posted by: Trevor M. D'Souza
Bookmark and Share this page (what is this?)
Social bookmarking allows users to save and categorise a personal collection of bookmarks and share them with others. This is different to using your own browser bookmarks which are available using the menus within your web browser.
Use the links below to share this article on the social bookmarking site of your choice.
Read more about social bookmarking at Wikipedia - Social Bookmarking
Variants Associated with Pediatric Allergic Disorder
Mutations in PHF6 Found in T-Cell Leukemia
Genetic Risk Variant for Urinary Bladder Cancer
Antibody Has Therapeutic Effect on Mice with ALS
Regulating P53 Activity in Cancer Cells
Anti-RNA Therapy Counters Breast Cancer Spread
Mitochondrial DNA Diversity
The Power of RNA Sequencing
‘Pro-Ageing' Therapy for Cancer?
Niche Genetics Influence Leukaemia
Molecular Biology: Clinical Promise for RNA Interference
Chemoprevention Cocktail for Colon Cancer
more news ...