An anonymous online poll of nearly 1700 researchers has revealed intriguing insights into scientists' views on the use of animals in research.
The results of the poll, conducted by Nature, and published online, suggest that biomedical researchers have range of opinions regarding the use of animals, but feel that pressure from the animal rights movement makes it hard to voice such opinions in public.
Researchers report an overall feeling that they do not receive encouragement or support from universities or institutions to talk about their animal research work with the public. Most said they had no ethical misgivings about the role of animals in their work but this was only as long as their work conformed to high ethical and welfare standards and where there was no alternative. But the fifth of researchers with misgivings spoke of conflicting feelings - for example while feeling uncomfortable with primate research also realizing that without it HIV vaccine candidates would be rarely brought to human trial.
This Internet poll was not a rigorously defined survey, but an attempt to gauge opinion among Nature readers in the biosciences. The full text is available at www.nature.com/news
Contact for background information:
Claire Ainsworth (Journalist Nature)
(C) Nature press release.
Message posted by: Trevor M. D'Souza
Bookmark and Share this page (what is this?)
Social bookmarking allows users to save and categorise a personal collection of bookmarks and share them with others. This is different to using your own browser bookmarks which are available using the menus within your web browser.
Use the links below to share this article on the social bookmarking site of your choice.
Read more about social bookmarking at Wikipedia - Social Bookmarking