|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
HUM-MOLGEN -> mail archive | Search | register for news alert (free) | |||||||||||||||
Carlo Gambacorti: DIAG: | ||||||||||||||||
[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Topic Index] |
||||||||||||||||
To: Multiple recipients of list HUM-MOLGEN <HUM-MOLGEN@NIC.SURFNET.NL> Subject: DIAG: From: Carlo Gambacorti <GAMBACORTI@icil64.cilea.it> Date: Mon, 22 May 1995 09:04:27 MET-DST Note from the DIAGNOSTIC/CLINICAL RESEARCH editor: This DIAG message contains 2 submessages: 1) Balanced 1;5 translocation 2) Familial Coloboma ************************************************************************ HUM-MOLGEN DIAGnostics/Clinical Research ************************************************************************ I have a pregnant family member with a fetal karyotype which exhibits a "balanced 1,5 translocation" by light microscopy. One of the parents also exhibits this karyotype and is phenotypically normal. There is no family history of retardation or genetic disease, although there is a history of spontaneous miscarriages. There appears to be a standard reccomendation in the literature that familial(not de novo) apparently balanced translocation confers no greater risk than the background IF the parent is phenotypically normal and a translocation carrier. However a few older papers by Fryns et al from 1986 and 1988 seem to dispute this. Steinbach(1986) accuses the Fryns paper of ascertainment bias. Specifically, is the risk of abnormality reduced to the so called background risk in light of the phenotypically normal parent? Also, is there the possibility of a more detailed submicroscopic point by point comparison of the parental chromosomes with the fetal chromosomes to increase the likelihood of a normal child. Thank you in advance for reading this message, and for any help you might provide, time is of the essence. Deborah W Rowe rowedw@CTRVAX.VANDERBILT.EDU *************************************************************************** I'm attempting to find out if there are any labs that are looking at familial coloboma. We recently evaluated a child with bilateral iris, choroid and retina coloboma. A dysmorphology exam was unremarkable for any signs of an underlying syndrome and the child is devloping normally. The proband's father has undergone numerous ophthalmologic assessments without any evidence of coloboma. His brother, his father, and three paternal aunts are affected. This family would be interested in participating in any molecular research looking at candidate genes for coloboma. I would be delighted to hear from any researchers that would be interested in studying this family. Anna Newlin, MS Genetic Counselor University of Illinois at Chicago Eye and Ear Infirmary annanewl@uic.edu |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Mail converted by |