home   genetic news   bioinformatics   biotechnology   literature   journals   ethics   positions   events   sitemap
 
  HUM-MOLGEN -> Events -> Meetings and Conferences  
 

What Is a Good Life? Can Science and Medicine Tell Us?

 
  September 30, 2015  
     
 


Battle of Ideas, Barbican Centre, Silk Street, London EC2Y 8DS
10am-11.30am, Saturday 17 October 2015


A public discussion of science, medicine, life and living taking place at the Barbican Centre, as part of the Battle over Life and Death strand of the Battle of Ideas festival.

It is increasingly assumed that various aspects of human life can and should be understood in terms of science and medicine. For example, our consciousness, happiness, morality, politics, sexual orientation and so on are regularly presented as being scientifically explicable. When we want to answer the questions that confront us, or decide upon a course of action, we turn increasingly to data and scientific research and health advice.

Today, human characteristics tend to be attributed to our genes and our biology, failing which they are attributed to our 'environment' - a scientific category which supposedly encompasses society and all of its rich dynamics. Recently, the field of epigenetics has been seized upon as a possible route through which our experiences and lifestyles might be inscribed in our biology - and the biology of future generations. Increasingly, the energies of governments, charities and campaigns are devoted to promoting public health and persuading people to live healthily. Longevity is often extolled as a virtue in itself and regarded as so important that measures can be taken to restrict our behaviour in order to promote longevity, such as bans on smoking or increasing the cost of alcohol.

But the ancient question of what (if anything) we should be living for, and what it might mean to lead a good life, is more elusive than ever. Have we left ourselves any room for a non-scientific assessment of our lot, and how to improve it? Are there occasions when we should reject scientific and medical authority? Indeed, is scientific authority used as cover for old-fashioned moralism or pre-existing prejudices? Or does science finally provide us with objective, testable evidence about the best way to live? Is the rise of scientific thinking about how to live our lives, and why we live as we do, a symptom of the failure of ethics to provide a satisfactory answer?
 
 
Organized by: Battle of Ideas
Invited Speakers: Jeannette Pols (Professor of Social Theory, Humanism and Materialities at the University of Amsterdam's Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, and author of the book Care at a Distance: On the Closeness of Technology)

Nancy Hey (Director of the What Works Centre for Wellbeing)

Dr Nessa Carey (International Director of PraxisUnico, and author of The Epigenetics Revolution: How Modern Biology is Rewriting Our Understanding of Genetics, Disease and Inheritance and Junk DNA: A Journey Through the Dark Matter of the Genome)

Angus Kennedy (Convenor of the Academy, and author of Being Cultured: In Defence of Discrimination)

Rob Lyons (Science and Technology director at the Institute of Ideas, Campaigns Manager at Action on Consumer Choice and author of Panic on a Plate: How Society Developed an Eating Disorder)

The discussion will open with a welcome from Sandy Starr (Communications Officer at the Progress Educational Trust and Webmaster of BioNews) and Dr Helen Jamison (Head of Media at the Wellcome Trust, Trustee of the Science Media Centre and Trustee of Compassion in Dying)

[All of the speakers listed above are confirmed]
 
Deadline for Abstracts: N/A
 
Registration: Details of how to book for the Battle of Ideas festival can be found online here.
E-mail: sstarr@progress.org.uk
 
   
 
home   genetic news   bioinformatics   biotechnology   literature   journals   ethics   positions   events   sitemap
 
 
 

Generated by meetings and positions 5.0 by Kai Garlipp
WWW: Kai Garlipp, Frank S. Zollmann.
7.0 © 1995- HUM-MOLGEN. All rights reserved. Liability, Copyright and Imprint.