home   genetic news   bioinformatics   biotechnology   literature   journals   ethics   positions   events   sitemap
 
  HUM-MOLGEN -> Events -> Meetings and Conferences  
 

Developing the Master V&V Plan to Meet U.S. FDA, ISO 13485 and 14971 Requirements - Webinar By GlobalCompliancePanel

 
  April 08, 2011  
     
 


GlobalCompliancePanel, Online Training Webinar
2011-05-11


Overview: FDA Warning Letters and recent high-profile recalls indicate major cGMP deficiencies in many companies. One major failing is lack of sufficient or targeted risk-based company-wide V&V planning.

Starting with a Master Validation Plan, evaluating its elements against ISO 14971 hazard analysis / risk management, allows development of meaningful product validations. The roles of different V&V protocols. How to employ equipment / process DQs, IQs, OQs, and PQs, or their equivalents, against a background of limited company resources (personnel, budget, time). A matrix simplifies "as-product", "in-product", process, and equipment, et al, software V&VT, assuring key FDA requirements are not overlooked. The QMS and 21 CFR Part 11 must be considered.

Why Should You Attend: Verification and validation requirements have always been part of the US FDA's GMPs. However, with increasing technology, both industry and regulatory agencies expectations have increased. Recent high-profile field problems indicate that V&V activities are not planned or carried out as completely as expected, and may not be fully utilizing the power of current risk management tools, as identified in ISO 14971. The billions of dollars spent by industry annually for V&V are not providing the product safety or efficacy seemingly promised. For most companies, the fixes are not rocket-science, but proper up-front V&V planning and execution.

Areas Covered In the Session:
  • Verification or Validation - Recent regulatory expectations
  • The Master Validation Plan / structure
  • Product Validation – how it differs from process / equipment V&V
  • Process / Equipment / Facility Validation - FDA's new guidance
  • When and How to use DQ, IQ, OQ, PQ, or their equivalents
  • How to use Product Risk Management Tools (per ISO 14971 and ICH Q9)
  • The 11 key documents for software validation
  • Incorporating 21 CFR Part 11 requirements
  • Suggested "test case" formats
Who will benefit:
  • Senior management in Drugs, Devices, Biologics, Dietary Supplements
  • QA
  • RA
  • R&D
  • Engineering
  • Production
  • Operations
  • Consultants; others tasked with product, process, software ... validation responsibilities
 
 
Organized by: GlobalCompliancePanel
Invited Speakers:
John E. Lincoln is a medical device and regulatory affairs consultant. He has helped companies to implement or modify their GMP systems and procedures, product risk management, U.S. FDA responses. In addition, he has successfully designed, written and run all types of process, equipment and software qualifications/validations, which have passed FDA audit or submission scrutiny, and described in peer-reviewed technical articles, and workshops, world wide. John has also managed pilot production, regulatory affairs, product development/design control, 510(k) submissions, risk management per ISO 14971, and projects; with over 28 years of experience in the FDA-regulated medical products industry - working with start-ups to Fortune 100 companies, including Abbott Laboratories, Hospira, Tyco/Mallinckrodt. He is a graduate of UCLA.
 
Deadline for Abstracts: 2011-05-11
 
Registration: Price List:
Live : $245.00
Corporate live : $995.00
Recorded : $295.00
E-mail: webinars@globalcompliancepanel.com
 
   
 
home   genetic news   bioinformatics   biotechnology   literature   journals   ethics   positions   events   sitemap
 
 
 

Generated by meetings and positions 5.0 by Kai Garlipp
WWW: Kai Garlipp, Frank S. Zollmann.
7.0 © 1995- HUM-MOLGEN. All rights reserved. Liability, Copyright and Imprint.